Canola Oil: It’s NOT Bad for You!
I have no vested interest in selling canola oil to anyone. I also don’t use canola oil at home. I just get frustrated when health misinformation proliferates. So here we are.
Canola History: Cultural and Agricultural
First, there was the rapeseed (from the Latin rapum, meaning “turnip,” to which the rapeseed plant is closely related). People in Europe, India, and Asia have cultivated rapeseed for thousands of years. It’s a hardy plant, with high yields, especially suited to the colder climates of the Northern hemisphere.
Unfortunately, rapeseed has a naturally bitter flavor, due mostly to a compound called erucic acid. So rapeseed was mostly used to feed livestock, to light oil lamps, and to lubricate machinery. On top of that, even if people were inclined to look past the bitterness, research in the 1960s began to implicate erucic acid in heart disease, in dogs and rats. Even though there was no evidence of harm in humans (and even though it was rarely used as a food), regulators jumped in to keep erucic acid out of the human diet. Rapeseed oil became illegal in the US for human consumption – alongside its close cousin, mustard oil, for the same reasons.
In retrospect, that may have been a bad choice. Recent research suggests erucic acid is actually good for us. You can read a more about erucic acid pros and cons here
The thing is, rapeseed is hardy in Northern climates. It would clearly be a boon to farmers, if they could grow it. So in the 1970s, botanists in Canada bred a new rapeseed cultivar with lower levels of erucic acid. (To be clear, they actually bred it the old-fashioned way. This was a non-GMO process!) This new oilseed plant had the same hardiness, the same high yields, but much lower erucic acid, and it tasted neutral. Win-win.
Canola History: Market Acceptance
Next step was getting people to trust this newfangled creation. Turns out, names matter, and not everyone is fluent in Botanical Latin. So the marketing people finally addressed the elephant in the room, and rechristened this new cultivar “Canola” (from “Canada Oil Low Acid.”)
This all happened in the mid- to late-1970s. Meaning canola entered the market just when Public Health was enter a period of intensely dogmatic black-and-white thinking about fats and oils. In short: we were told saturated fats were BAD, and unsaturated fats were GOOD. All of which made highly polyunsaturated Canola oil very, very, very good indeed! At least that’s how it was marketed. And then the press and the health authorities took it and ran with it.
BUT – saturated fats are not all bad, and unsaturated fats are not all good. And the thing is — and here’s my personal analysis, take it for what it’s worth — when some presumed authority overstates their case, people tend to counterbalance the first overstatement with an equal and opposite overstatement of their own. It’s a natural human tendency: we want to swing the pendulum back, hard. As I see it, that’s what’s happened with canola. It’s why some people say canola oil is toxic, a genetically modified carcinogen that bespoils the precious bodily fluids of America’s youth.
Again, the psychosocial analysis is mine, and mine alone. But let’s take a closer look at the science.
Canola Truth
Some people say canola genetically modified. Yes, a new strain of GMO canola was developed in the 1990s, to withstand toxic herbicides. But organic canola is not genetically modified. Period.
Some people say canola oil is extracted from the seed using the toxic solvent, hexane. Much non-organic canola oil is; by law (and by practice) organic canola oil is not. Period.
Some people say canola is full of unstable polyunsaturated fats that can go rancid, become trans-fats, and feed inflammation. I agree! Canola oil does not store well for years and years; it does not stand up to very high heat well for hours and hours in the fryer. Still, that’s no reason fresh, clean canola doesn’t have a place in salad dressing, or to cook at lower temperatures for shorter periods of time.
Some people say canola oil is bad for the heart. I’m frankly having a hard time understanding this. It has been so extensively researched, so consistently shown to be beneficial. It may not be quite as beneficial as olive oil. But it’s no slouch.
Some people say canola oil will give you cancer. There’s a tiny glimmer of truth in there. Again, it oxidizes more easily than other oils. Oxidized foods can be carcinogenic. And again, this can be solved by consuming fresh (i.e. non-rancid) canola, and not leaving it in the fryer all day.
Some people say canola oil is somehow bad from the environment. Recent, complex Scope-3–level analysis of seed-to-bottle lifecycle has actually shown a lower carbon footprint for canola oil than most other oils — depending on where it’s grown. The colder, and more northerly the climate, the better.
To my mind, the three real arguments against canola oil are:
- It doesn’t taste like anything. (I suppose that’s a con and a pro).
- It doesn’t have any special health properties, like olive oil, sesame oil, and coconut oil.
- It doesn’t stay fresh as long as some other fats.
But to shy away from it by default is just silly.